Enough evidence to indict Trump, Jan. 6 panelists say

The committee investigating the Capitol riots held its first public hearing last week, and more evidence is due to be unveiled at hearings this week.

WASHINGTON — Members of the House committee investigating the Capitol riot said Sunday they had uncovered enough evidence for the Justice Department to consider an unprecedented criminal indictment against former President Donald Trump for attempting to investigate the findings of the Cancel 2020 elections.

“I would like to see the Justice Department investigate any credible allegations of criminal activity by Donald Trump,” said Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., a committee member who also chairs the House Intelligence Committee. “There are certain actions, parts of these various efforts to overthrow the election, that I don’t see evidence that the Justice Department is investigating.”

The committee held its first public hearing last week, with members arguing their case against Trump, to show how the defeated president has relentlessly pushed his false claims of a rigged election, despite several advisers telling him otherwise, and how he did extraordinary plan to overthrow Joe Biden exacerbated victory.

More evidence is due to be unveiled in hearings this week, which will show how Trump and his advisers made “massive efforts” to spread misinformation and pressured the Justice Department to accept his false claims.

Committee members said Sunday their key audience as the hearings progress may ultimately be Attorney General Merrick Garland, who must decide whether his department can and should prosecute Trump. They left no doubt as to whether the evidence was sufficient.

“Once the evidence is gathered by the Justice Department, it must make a decision as to whether it can prove beyond a reasonable doubt the president’s guilt or anyone else’s,” Schiff said. “But they need to be investigated when there is credible evidence, which I think is the case.”

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., said he had no intention of “intimidating” Garland, but noted that the committee had already set out in legal briefs a variety of criminal statutes they believe Trump violated.

“I think he knows, his staff knows, US attorneys know what’s at stake here,” Raskin said. “They know how important it is, but I think they are right to look to the precedents in history as well as to the facts of this case.”

Garland has not indicated how he might proceed, which would be unprecedented and complicated in a political election season in which Trump has openly flirted with the idea of ​​running for president again in 2024. “We will follow the facts wherever they lead,” Garland said in his speech at Harvard University’s inaugural ceremony last month.

A federal judge in California said in a March civil case ruling that Trump “most likely” committed federal crimes when he attempted to obstruct the January 6, 2021 congressional count of the Electoral College’s ballots. The judge cited two laws: obstruction of an official process and conspiracy to defraud the United States. Trump has denied any wrongdoing.

Schiff appeared on ABC’s This Week and Raskin spoke on CNN’s State of the Union. Enough evidence to indict Trump, Jan. 6 panelists say

Alley Einstein is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button