Here Is Just How Convoluted And Corrupted The Ginni & Clarence Thomas Saga Is

Texas Paul said: “Ginni Thomas, that was the worst of them all. In less than fifteen minutes, he lays out the Clarence Thomas impeachment case, including relationships and conflicts of interest that the average American citizen may never have heard of, unless they were serious. actively participate in the politics of the Supreme Court.

WASHINGTON, DC – October 21: (LR) Supreme Court Associate Justice Clarence Thomas sits with his wife and conservative activist Virginia Thomas while he waits to speak at the Heritage Foundation on October 21, 2021 in Washington , DC. (Photo by Drew Angerer / Getty Images)

Watch below as Texas Paul presents a staggering list of cases in which Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and his wife Ginni were directly involved in politics, despite his moral obligation to neuter.

The most overt were, of course, the election disinformation and insurgency plots – all of which Ginni Thomas was deeply involved in, appearing at the Capitol on January 6, 2021, while her husband sat on the bench of the Supreme Court refusing to repurpose himself from cases involving Capitol Violence, despite an apparent conflict of interest.

While it’s not the most shocking, the most striking part of this is that Justice Thomas has had the guts to complain about people “not living with an outcome we don’t like” regarding the protests. for after news that SCOTUS might be toppling Roe v. Wade – while his wife was actually part of an effort to overturn the 2020 election.

Then there are her links to John Eastman – the attorney who wrote a memo explaining how to overturn the election. She even introduced him to Trump!

That’s not all – she was involved with the Heritage Foundation and with the nomination of SCOTUS judges to George W. Bush, while her husband was adjudicating the Bush v Gore case – very openly stood by her side. on the side of a case her husband is actually hearing.

see more


Then there’s Frank Gaffney, who paid Ginni Thomas to do consulting work as he wrote an amicus brief for a case the Supreme Court – and yes, Justice Thomas – was hearing.

The Thomases have argued that they keep their jobs separate and that Ginni is certainly entitled to her own political and partisan views – but in the end, it’s impossible to listen to this 14-minute analysis and still believe that the two hold their work separately. or that these cases would not be considered a conflict of interest in any other court level.


Steph Bazzle

Steph Bazzle reports on social and religious issues for Hill Reporter. She focuses on stories about people’s right to practice what they believe in and to have the support of their communities and government officials. You can contact her at Here Is Just How Convoluted And Corrupted The Ginni & Clarence Thomas Saga Is

Alley Einstein is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button