A recommendation to change the transfer rules for Division I collegiate athletes was sent back to a committee for further investigation by the NCAA’s DI Board of Directors.
A recommendation to change the transfer rules for Division I collegiate athletes, which included unlimited opportunities to change schools with immediate eligibility, was returned Wednesday by the NCAA’s DI Board of Directors to a committee for further investigation.
The carryover rules proposals were among several coming out of the NCAA’s Transformation Committee and pushed forward by the Division I Council two weeks ago.
“We have some questions about the proposed transfer package and we will revisit this issue at our next meeting on August 31. Many of us have concerns about the impact that name, image and likeness have on the transfer process and we want further analysis on this topic and its potential impact on graduation rates before taking any action,” said the President and Chief Executive Officer of the University of Georgia, Jere Morehead, in a statement.
The Board adopted the Transformation Committee’s recommendations, which would allow schools to offer more financial benefits to athletes.
“Schools can now pay more to support a student’s academic pursuits, purchase insurance such as serious injury or illness and disability, and fund participation in elite-level training, trials and competitions,” Greg Sankey, co-chair of Transformation Committee, Southeastern Conference commissioner, and Ohio University athletic director Julie Cromer in a statement.
Proposed changes to transfer rules also included the introduction of sport-specific windows during an academic year, requiring athletes to enter their names into the transfer portal to be immediately eligible to participate the following year.
Athletes in winter and spring sports would be required to submit written notification of the transfer 60 days after NCAA championship selection in their sport.
In fall sports, including football, two windows of entry have been proposed. The first would start the day after the championship was selected and last 45 days. The second would be from May 1st to May 15th.
The Student Athlete Advisory Committee raised concerns about the transfer windows.
“SAAC fully supports several aspects of the transfer concept, but we believe transfer windows unnecessarily restrict the movement of student-athletes,” said Missouri volleyball player Brynn Carlson.
The proposal, which caused a stir among coaches and administrators, was to change the rule to allow athletes to switch as often as they want and play right away, as long as they are academically eligible and graduate.
Currently, all athletes receive a one-time exemption that allows them to transfer and be immediately admitted to their new school.
For athletes in high-profile sports like soccer and basketball, this one-off exemption was only granted last year. This has been the case in other sports for years.
“Based on this dialogue, we will work to refine our proposal to clarify how transfer policies will align with ongoing academic admissions and study progression requirements, and to address current and emerging collegiate athletics issues.” solve,” said Cromer and Sankey. “We’ll also have the opportunity to learn more about the latest posts from student-athletes around transfer windows.”
https://www.king5.com/article/sports/college/proposed-ncaa-transfer-rule-changes-kicked-back-to-committee/281-30fc14ac-7020-478e-b1c3-b3a555692eb6 Proposed NCAA transfer rule changes kicked back to committee