Ripley’s denies Kim Kardashian damaged Marilyn Monroe dress

The before and after photos posted on social media have sparked debate over whether Kim Kardashian damaged the iconic dress wearing it at the Met Gala.

NEW YORK – Ripley’s Believe It or Not! on Thursday denied claims that Kim Kardashian’s wearing of Marilyn Monroe’s iconic “Happy Birthday” dress caused it to suffer new damage.

ChadMichael Morrisette, who owns a mannequin supply company and worked with a glittering lamp briefly worn by Kardashian at the Met Gala, said he discovered new damage on the covered garment. crystal while visiting a Ripley’s Los Angeles location.

Morrisette shared photos of the 60-year-old dress on June 12 with a friend and collector Monroe, who caused quite a stir earlier this week when he posted the before and after photos on social media. festival.

“It makes me sad. I’ve run out of tears,” Morrisette told The Associated Press.

Kardashian turned into a replica after climbing the Grand Staircase of the Metropolitan Museum of Art on May 2. She wore the nude dress in just a few minutes. Ripley’s bought the dress for $4.8 million in 2016 in an auction. Morrisette said he was hired to stage Monroe memorabilia including the look Monroe wore in 1962 to celebrate then-President John F. Kennedy on his 45th birthday.

“From the bottom of the Met steps, where Kim put on the dress, to the top where it was returned, the dress was in its original condition,” said Amanda Joiner of Ripley, vice president of publishing and licensing. in the report.

She wore the dress on the day of the gala and in the process shipped it from Orlando, Florida, where it was last shown, to New York, according to Ripley’s.

Morrisette’s photos, along with pre-Met Gala images of the dress, went viral on social media amid criticism at the time of the gala that Kardashian shouldn’t have been allowed to wear the dress. fragile and remarkable in history. It is made of a flammable fabric that is no longer marketed.

Morrisette said he was shocked to see its condition. He said he saw fabric stretched at the back zipper and the holster with new hand-stitched crystals missing. He also said his shoulders seemed tense. He said the extent of the damage didn’t show up after more than a dozen times he’d viewed the dress over the years.

Ripley’s said shortly after the gala that the dress handling had been done carefully and no alteration was allowed. Kardashian changed into a clone after reaching the top of the stairs. She hid the back of her dress under a white coat, leading to speculation the dress wasn’t pulled all the way.

According to Ripley’s, a report written about the dress’s condition in early 2017 said that “some seams were pulled and worn. This is not surprising given how delicate the material is. There are dents in the back by the hooks and eyes,” among other damage cases.

The dress was studded with more than 2,500 crystals, custom-made for Monroe. It was based on sketches by renowned designer Bob Mackie, working for fashion designer Jean Louis at the time.

When asked about Kardashian’s response to the damage controversy, a rep approved Ripley’s statement without further comment.

Ripley’s said it allowed Kardashian to wear the dress to keep Monroe’s legacy alive.

“Our mission is to both entertain and educate visitors and fans, and spark conversations like the speeches around Marilyn Monroe’s dress do just that,” the company said. “No matter which side of the argument you are on, the historical importance of the dress is not denied but on the contrary is emphasized. A whole new group of young people has now been introduced to Marilyn Monroe’s legacy. ” Ripley’s denies Kim Kardashian damaged Marilyn Monroe dress

Russell Falcon is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Related Articles

Back to top button